3 ms·
In my experience, Azure is a must for .NET applications. Everything is just so well integrated together. You can setup a web/api that's deployed via Github Acti
by jcmontx 4y ago
In my experience, Azure is a must for .NET applications. Everything is just so well integrated together. You can setup a web/api that's deployed via Github Actions with just a couple clicks. Same goes for webapps build with React/Angular/etc.
You can include a managed SQL server instance; or go for the unmatched CosmosDB. The Storage is also pretty good and almost free.
I just don't see this level of integration in other cloud providers.
- parkingrift 4y agoYou can do all those things trivially with practically every major hosting provider.
- tracker1 4y agoEven with .Net ... on small to even medium-ish scale, you can deploy a couple Dokku nodes, deploy to all three, set them behind a load balancer and use the hosted PostgreSQL + replica. This can handle a lot of load with minimal startup cost and scale relatively easily on almost any mid-tier provider at a lot less cost. You can still deploy with Github actions, still have redundancy on the front end and pay a couple hundred a month vs. many hundreds or thousands.
- dustinmoris 4y agoI disagree. .NET actually literally is better supported on AWS. But, if what you say were true then that is a reason to never use .NET anymore.