3 ms·
Yeah I thought that was 1 MB per SITE, but it's 1 MB per PAGE which is WAY too big! I don't want to load that on my phone I just checked and my home page is 3
by chubot 4y ago
Yeah I thought that was 1 MB per SITE, but it's 1 MB per PAGE which is WAY too big! I don't want to load that on my phone
I just checked and my home page is 3,575 bytes, which is 280x smaller than 1 MB:
$ curl https://www.oilshell.org | wc --bytes
3575
The longest article on the site is ~5200 words, and less than 57KB, or 17.6x smaller:
$ curl 'http://www.oilshell.org/blog/2022/03/backlog-arch.html' | wc --bytes
56672
http://www.oilshell.org/blog/2022/03/backlog-arch.html http://www.oilshell.org/blog/2022/03/backlog-arch.html
- pSYoniK 4y agoneat command! my homepage works out to 3,121 bytes and the longest article is 21,164. Never knew it's that small..
- speedgoose 4y agoI just did a fast.com speed test on my phone with 2 bars out of 4 of 5G and I have 400 Mbps.
- rustyminnow 4y agoNeat! I just did a fast.com speed test with 3/4 bars of 4G and got 60 Mbps! I didn't do a speed test, but I spent the weekend in an area where I was getting 1 bar and probably 5 Mbps if that. 5G coverage even when poor, is optimal conditions - not baseline.
- speedgoose 4y agoThe future is exciting (and warm)!
- hdbdhzuwb 4y agoThat is just counting the markup you deliver for those requests, not your style and JS bundles, which I don’t think is the spirit of the post.
- notriddle 4y agoOr images. On pages like https://bors.tech https://bors.tech and https://foodpartners.us https://foodpartners.us the "bloat" is all images. The images are bigger than they were in the 1990's because they look better, even if you don't think they communicate more "information" people may still want them.
- chubot 4y agoSure, that adds 2.3 kB for CSS and 739 bytes for JS, according to Chrome dev tools. Either way it's 1 or 2 orders of magnitude less than 1 MB