4 ms·

"No case" worked for me for about 18 months. Now I'm forced to wear a case to keep the broken glass from cutting my fingers when picking up my phone (the back o

by cj 4y ago

"No case" worked for me for about 18 months. Now I'm forced to wear a case to keep the broken glass from cutting my fingers when picking up my phone (the back of the phone shattered but the front is perfectly fine with no screen protector). How / why the back of a phone would be made of a material that is essential glass is beyond me.

gumby 4y ago
> How / why the back of a phone would be made of a material that is essential glass is beyond me. For wireless charging. If you pay for the extra warranty and break the glass screen you can replace it for $100. If you break the glass back the repair price is astronomical.
- solarmist 4y ago
  Yup, but this used to be the opposite. The front used to be the expense glass to replace.
  - gumby 4y ago
    Yes, this seems crazy which is why I mentioned it. Seems unfair that applecare doesn't cover it.
wodenokoto 4y ago
It is for two reasons: - It lets wireless through. - it’s design for the showroom, not at home. A plastic back would be better on most parameters. Lighter, sturdier and better grip. But it lacks _luster_ and doesn’t feel or look premium. The glass back is great for the showroom. Not as great once you get home and start using it.