3 ms·
I dont really get your point. He was an UX engineer at Apple. He probably was involved with the "goddamn ipad". He is not critizicing the Interface Method pers
by nchuhoai 15y ago
I dont really get your point.
He was an UX engineer at Apple. He probably was involved with the "goddamn ipad". He is not critizicing the Interface Method perse, since it is probably the best we can do right now given the size constraints and technological capabilities we have right now.
What he says however is that the long run, pictures behind the glass cannot be the solution. Or better said: shouldnt be.
- Volpe 15y agoI know who he is and where he's worked. But authority != always right The vision held a lot more than just swiping on glass, there were spacially aware devices, proximity networking, augmented reality... But that's not vision worthy... because the ipad already exists!? People are talking like, if you get a vision wrong (at the start) the whole journey is pointless. I'm saying, we can always change the things that don't work. If interacting with glass stops working out... we can ditch that for something better. Just like the iPhone/iPad doesn't fold in the middle (like the knowledge navigator vision presented).