3 ms·
I think Google's tooling works best primarily because it's uniform, not because it's the best for all use cases. Yes, they are efficient but that efficiency is
by sawyna 4y ago
I think Google's tooling works best primarily because it's uniform, not because it's the best for all use cases. Yes, they are efficient but that efficiency is worth it at Google scale and probably not required for everyone.
Blaze is cool, but do you want to do it for every small project? It's actually a bit annoying for small projects, the verbosity of it. Granted that it helps optimise a lot of downstream workflows and enables pretty good tooling, but you wouldn't need those in startups not operating at that scale.
Startups need speed over accuracy. Google needs accuracy over speed.
Source: Acquired from startup to Google.