3 ms·
Others have explained why this is not equivalent to low-tech tailing, so I won't repeat them. Instead, what precisely do you find so onerous about requiring a
by brigade 15y ago
Others have explained why this is not equivalent to low-tech tailing, so I won't repeat them.
Instead, what precisely do you find so onerous about requiring a warrant for GPS surveillance? And would you support private citizens using these devices to the same extent?
Anyway, I don't think anyone's reasonably arguing for banning this technology. Requiring a warrant is still going to allow law enforcement to to do a better job with fewer resources; I truly don't see why it would be such a big hassle.
- MartinCron 15y agowould you support private citizens using these devices to the same extent? That's actually a pretty cool test to determine if a warrant would be required. I'm NOT OK with private citizens wiretapping phones, but I am OK with law enforcement wiretapping phones if and only if they have a court-issued warrant in order to do so.