4 ms·
Even for a subdomain, having CNAME and TXT records on the same name isn't supposed to be okay; normally you'd work around it by reading the TXT record off an ot
by naniwaduni 4y ago
Even for a subdomain, having CNAME and TXT records on the same name isn't supposed to be okay; normally you'd work around it by reading the TXT record off an other unlikely-to-be-used subdomain of the name you're putting a CNAME on.
- antoniomika 4y agoNow that's one I never knew about. I'll have to take a look, should be easy enough to update prose to handle that though. edit: Updated prose to handle this
- mercora 4y agoi think SRV records might be more appropriate for this use case.
- kevincox 4y agoThis also has the advantage that it doesn't boat the TXT response for the domain. Putting it at some thing like _prose.sub.domain allows just getting the relevant record.