3 ms·
I thought they didn't want to be owned. Maybe it was just not wanting to be owned by activision. Maybe this is what they need to get 3rd party studios to help w
by downrightmike 4y ago
I thought they didn't want to be owned. Maybe it was just not wanting to be owned by activision. Maybe this is what they need to get 3rd party studios to help with content again. They are also working on a new game 'Material', maybe this helps with that.
- MisterBastahrd 4y agoThey need capital for their upcoming projects (the next AAA game and also mobile games) and Sony has movie and TV studios that can take the Destiny universe and expand it into a series.
- JeremyReimer 4y agoThey weren't owned by Activision-- Activision was only the publisher for Destiny, and never acquired the studio. When the publishing agreement came up for renewal, Bungie and Activision agreed to go their separate ways, for their own reasons. It's likely that Bungie wanted more control and more independence from the partnership. Bungie's aversion to being owned stems from their Microsoft days, when they yearned to be free from having to make Halo sequels. However, the reality is that game development is expensive. Destiny doesn't have a monthly subscription fee, so the income for the studio drops dramatically between paid content expansions. It's tough to keep that going without outside support, given the cost of creating said content. (Obligatory disclaimer: I work for a division of Activision, but these opinions are solely my own)