3 ms·
Which is why people here are attacking the article here despite it being good science.
by koheripbal 4y ago
Which is why people here are attacking the article here despite it being good science.
- moffkalast 4y agoBecause we're all anti-social shut-ins around here, get with the programe.
- z9znz 4y agoOr we just hate the other employees who have 1-2 layers of mental structures to build to do their jobs, while ours are 3-5 and require more focus. Almost everyone I have worked with in my long career has had some very redeeming qualities. But many of them just had no concept what was required mentally for me (and my kind) to do our jobs. We're not specifically anti-social, but we do want people to STFU enough for us to do the hard work.
- tunap 4y agoWhen I am on task I find others to be distracting, and that is my concentration problem, but it isn't an anti-social problem. I am not anti-social, I enjoy a certain amount of social interaction. I often prefer my lone time, more so. Nit Alert: I wish people used 'unsocial' more often. Anti-social means one is hostile or disruptive to social engagement(s). It is thrown around way too often and has an entirely different context to just being 'less inclined to interact with others'.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- mrweasel 4y agoPeople are a bit jade, because a study like this, plus the cost benefits can help push open office plans. On the other hand open offices have also been proven to be terrible for cognitive functions. Both are at the extreme ends of what you should be expose to, and both are based in science. But the middle is expensive, and even then people react differently to the same environments.