4 ms·
> If diversity was actually a strength, then it wouldn't take such a monumental effort (of actual discrimination, no less) to achieve it. The implication here
by enumjorge 4y ago
> If diversity was actually a strength, then it wouldn't take such a monumental effort (of actual discrimination, no less) to achieve it.
The implication here is that worthwhile efforts don't take a lot of work. That doesn't ring true at all.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- Jerrrry 4y agoYou are assuming "diversity" is worthwhile, then working backwards from that assumption, justifying the actual discrimination, all to arrive at a begged conclusion. If diversity was worthwhile - leading to productivity gains or whatever metric, then evidence of that would had manifested by now; and we wouldn't have to put an inordinate amount of effort into shoehorning diversity, for its own sake.
- Spooky23 4y agoThe company needs skilled people. So limiting the pool to whatever “normal” is to you reduces the scope of recruitment possibilities. Does that mean a Brazilian company should hire someone who only speaks Urdu? Probably not.