My (someone uncharitable) interpretation of the article is: - People who thing big corps and the government are their friend are not worried about data privacy

My (someone uncharitable) interpretation of the article is: - People who thing big corps and the government are their friend are not worried about data privacy. - The government suddenly made a change that made a lot of people realize that is is not necessarily their friend (aka they are no longer comfortable with the government have access to there entire life's worth of data). - Now we have to end surveillance capitalism because it is dangerous... I agree with the conclusion, but it is depressing that it has taking this long for people to reach it.