4 ms·
> that is not why it was created. It was part of the MIT MediaLab "Computer Clubhouse"[1] project > so it is just a matter of using the tools for what they wer
by antiterra 4y ago
> that is not why it was created. It was part of the MIT MediaLab "Computer Clubhouse"[1] project
> so it is just a matter of using the tools for what they were created to do.
Ah yes, the vaunted historic MIT culture of 'using things for what they were created to do.'
- jecel 4y agoI enjoy using stuff for things they were not created for. In my HN profile I claim to be a hacker in the old sense of the word, and this is a big part of old style hacking. But I am not then surprised when it takes a lot more effort than using something that had been created for that would take. For example, in 1983 I wrote a fancy Logo implementation using TI99/4A Extended Basic. It was far more complicated than the implementation I wrote in C. But the Basic version actually ran while the C version was just on paper since I didn't have access to any computers with C at the time. I think it is great that people end up doing in Scratch things that you would expect would need Python or something like that. But if some 5 line Python program becomes a monster in Scratch, that is to be expected. The opposite is also true: a 5 line Scratch program might take pages of Python to replicate.