> That is if you do not consider a persons labor to be "owned" by them That would be an insane stance to take. That is essentially arguing in favor of slavery,

> That is if you do not consider a persons labor to be "owned" by them That would be an insane stance to take. That is essentially arguing in favor of slavery, the idea that someone other than me owns my labour. You can own the output of my labour if you have an employment contract with me where I trade you that in exchange for something from you, but you can't ever own my labour itself. That would be nuts.