3 ms·
You're the one saying that they didn't manage properly the forests, I don't know if they did or not but what I know is that when the population increase at some
by renox 4y ago
You're the one saying that they didn't manage properly the forests, I don't know if they did or not but what I know is that when the population increase at some point forests cannot provide enough wood for everybody..
Especially since, as stated in the article, the fireplace of the time were inefficient..
- carapace 4y ago> You're the one saying that they didn't manage properly the forests, I don't know if they did or not... It's literally a quote from Ben Franklin? They cut down all the firewood for "near 100 Miles to some towns". > when the population increase at some point forests cannot provide enough wood for everybody Yes, of course, but not by 1744.
- yywwbbn 4y ago> Yes, of course, but not by 1744. There are more forests now in France and some other places in western Europe than there were in the 13th century.
- carapace 4y agoYes, but we're talking about North America, so..? The point isn't that coppicing et. al. produces infinite wood, it's that it's a better way to manage forests than just chopping down all the fucking trees, eh? Coal has never been the solution to an ecological problem.