4 ms·
I think most reasonable people are sensitive to this, that’s why I strongly advocate for a tech utopian vision of the future rather than some sort of back to na
by space_fountain 4y ago
I think most reasonable people are sensitive to this, that’s why I strongly advocate for a tech utopian vision of the future rather than some sort of back to nature idea
- turns0ut 4y agoI’m more of a bucolic life routines uplifted and assisted by automation type, than a Star Trek TNG live a life of technobabble. Designer drugs that leave behind the same memory markers as the real thing seem possible given bio-electric therapies and growing understanding of psychedelics in emotional therapy. VR goggles for everyone seem prosaic, corny af to me relative to such ideas. Traveling to every continent a huge waste.
- space_fountain 4y agoEither way I suspect no one is asking the developing world not to have an improved quality of life. I am suspicious, however, that bucolicism is incompatible with the number of people alive today, though I certainly like the esthetic
- peoplefromibiza 4y ago> I suspect no one is asking the developing world not to have an improved quality of life If you're referring to me, I ask myself if the largest country of the western world (and the worst offender in terms of dangerous emissions for 40 years straight) built cities where people cannot walk and need cars to move, can be still considered developed or it should be considered irresponsible.