12 ms·
What you've just described is ... an executor runtime. Even if you boil it down to doing "only" that, you still can only have one of that per thread, and there
by stormbrew 4y ago
What you've just described is ... an executor runtime. Even if you boil it down to doing "only" that, you still can only have one of that per thread, and there isn't just one way to implement that.