According to the logic of the original Roe v Wade decision, wouldn't the invention of artificial wombs mean that abortion would no longer be a constitutional ri

According to the logic of the original Roe v Wade decision, wouldn't the invention of artificial wombs mean that abortion would no longer be a constitutional right? It is a strange legal framework to be operating in if the creation of new technologies can cause people's existing rights to disappear. I can't think of any other example of that happening, unlike, say, 4th amendment protections being increased as governments gain more surveillance technology, or 2nd amendment rights applying to types of weapons that weren't imagined when the right was created.