> But I will say that unionization does come with a cost that is borne not by Amazon’s executives or their shareholders, but ... I like parts of the analysis (

> But I will say that unionization does come with a cost that is borne not by Amazon’s executives or their shareholders, but ... I like parts of the analysis (if a big player has to pay higher wages, this will affect many in different ways). But I think it's hard to discuss what exactly the implications would be without a deeper analysis including numbers. Without numbers, I find that participants in a discussion are often tempted to put a high emphasis on a certain argument or on the impact of a mechanism just because they have come up with that argument or mechanism. But actual numbers might imply a different weighting. An example would be: With longer fingernails you might be able to swim faster. But to what degree?