3 ms·
Assuming that your post is actually a valid indicator of a risk of self-harm and suicide, three years can hardly be described as "in a timely manner", even if i
by jaclaz 4y ago
Assuming that your post is actually a valid indicator of a risk of self-harm and suicide, three years can hardly be described as "in a timely manner", even if it was appropriate to point you to those resources, it makes no sense to do so three years later.
BTW I cannot see how the posted meme can be connected to risk of self-harm and suicide, am I missing some reference?
- the_only_law 4y ago> am I missing some reference? Some of these moderation algorithms are pretty stupid/over zealous. I was watching a follow-up on the YouTube elsagate crisis that happened some years back, and apparently one of their late solutions to the problems ended up deleting anything with tags or titles that could be remotely connected to children's animation, resulting in a ton of being videos being struck down. Also, when the "fact checking" was released on FB and Instagram, obvious memes and obvious bait (literally explicitly stating it was bait) were being "fact checked".
- jaclaz 4y agoYes, what I don't understand is the possible (even if wrong) connection that the algorithms may have established between the specific meme and suicide. Is the "change my mind" or the "Sopranos" that may trigger the algorithm? Or are all memes associated to self-harm/suicide?