Reading the comments here you'd think this article was complaining about what zero trust is or how it is bad. Instead it is about how we explain Zero Trust to o

Reading the comments here you'd think this article was complaining about what zero trust is or how it is bad. Instead it is about how we explain Zero Trust to others and the very real interpretation of "zero trust for (you)" by end users hearing about this be policy. A realistic interpretation given the way machines and etc are locked down. It doesn't seem like a bad idea to me to come up with a better name to avoid friction with those unfamiliar with the concept. Even as it is on HN people seem to jump to conclusions based on the name so imagine non technical users hearing about this.