I think this continues to ignore my point. There is no absolute free speech. As the US court has repeatedly ruled, porn is a type of speech and thus unlimited f

I think this continues to ignore my point. There is no absolute free speech. As the US court has repeatedly ruled, porn is a type of speech and thus unlimited free speech includes the proliferation of child pornography. Instead we have to choose as a society which harms are sufficient to prohibit certain forms of speech and which are not. Unless you are arguing people should be free to distribute child porn you should stop taking this free-speech absolutism approach. You avoid the central question entirely and thus don’t say anything meaningful on which speech should be allowed and which speech shouldn’t.