I have been trawling through large numbers of papers recently as part of my computer science Master's background research, and some papers are quite frankly uni

I have been trawling through large numbers of papers recently as part of my computer science Master's background research, and some papers are quite frankly unintelligible garble... I can't even understand how they passed peer review. I would say that of the articles I've read, maybe 5% are meaningful contributions that advance the science; maybe 25% contribute something to the current understanding, perhaps 60% are "we did something cool", and 10% are "are these reviewers awake".