4 ms·
> There's a lot of comments on this thread pointing out typical bandwidth usage of popular streaming services, games etc and claiming that there's no need for h
by daniel-cussen 4y ago
> There's a lot of comments on this thread pointing out typical bandwidth usage of popular streaming services, games etc and claiming that there's no need for higher bandwidth connections.
You said it, not me. You said there's shills on this thread. That's the only possible motivation to argue there's no need for more bandwidth, there's another reason I came up with but I don't want it to be plagiarized, so I won't say it, they're stuck rehashing the "really sincere" focus group maneuver. It's also because actual bandwidth meaning through a wire has more rights and is better protected from tapping than wireless or radio or what is it now 5G? So the whole game is to funnel people to depending on this little walkie talkie that never turns off and which has no buttons, and is so sophisticated you can't fix it yourself, and has a baseband (that's a whole nother conspiracy theory but it's boring), and it gets GPS readings like every time you don't consent for it to, and that's why they're attacking the pipe, the wire, the cable, the fiber, they want everybody getting a cellular antenna for everything. The wire means having rights, photons it's like, everything goes. Surveillance in fact, they want us all to literally broadcast our eg 911 calls instead of calling them on a landline. They don't like landlines because they're well-litigated, have rights, martyrs died over getting their line tapped or being unable to call 911 just by pressing 911 (there's a case over that, they were meant to dial 9 first, 9911, and victims couldn't get through to emergency service and one died), 5G turns back the martyr clock forty years.
Yeah totally want to get all my needs met by a nagging machine.
Like these guys run their own ISP you think they can't log into a site and tell them both sides of the story? They've been doing it since the 1910's. Or shill robots by this point. I wonder if it counts as public speaking if you're only speaking to robots. Just trying to pass the Cussen Test here. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31111806 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31111806
You said it, not me.
- heartbreak 4y agoRegarding your Cussen Test, did you write this comment using something like GPT-2? I got curious so I checked a few of your account’s other comments. Some of them are very similar to this one [0], but others are short and concise [1]. I can think of a few other explanations for this, but since you mentioned the test… [0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31937861 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31937861 [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31988748 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31988748
- daniel-cussen 4y agoYou know what? I've been diagnosed as spectrum autism, believe what you want. Suppose this can be reverse psychology, there is nothing I can say that can't be plagiarized. I don't have a really good way of proving it digitally. At least I'm getting replies, which I could not on the initial Cussen Test post. Any reply is progress, but I think I passed the test already, wow.