3 ms·
There ought to be an organization willing to offer these maintainers the option to transfer control to a committee or organization set up to be stewards. Not qu
by AaronFriel 4y ago
There ought to be an organization willing to offer these maintainers the option to transfer control to a committee or organization set up to be stewards. Not quite locked and frozen, but say, resistant to change. Security fixes only.
Perhaps the Linux Foundation would sponsor something like this? A package that hasn't been updated since 2015 should be considered frozen, not a long term risk. End of life open source projects should be safe to use, not undetonated warheads.
- bee_rider 4y agoCompanies that want to build a business on open source software should fork it and then read it before deploying it to customers (or hire the author). Or hire someone to do that. Programmers gotta eat too.