5 ms·

>There was a time when only wealthy folks could afford goods. Capitalism happened and now everyone can afford goods. Okay this may sound abstract.....when you

>There was a time when only wealthy folks could afford goods. Capitalism happened and now everyone can afford goods. Okay this may sound abstract.....when you buy an object which has been crafted to perfection by another artist....you dont just buy the object ....it feels like you almost bought some of that perfection...it feels like maybe it can breathe some perfection into your work! On a cynical note maybe it makes it easier for you to justify the amount of hard work that you put in perfecting every infinitely minute detail in your work. It is also comforting to know that there are people out there who value perfection and attention to detail like you.....and when you show them your work they'll see all the hard work you have put into it.

JabavuAdams 15y ago
Marketing works. This is an example of marketing based on authenticity. Regarding perfection: machines are much more capable of perfection re: manufacturing than humans. Where I think we get confused is that in the past only corporations had the capital to mass-produce, and they have an incentive to "race to the bottom" in terms of production cost. Although it's not the goal, usually quality suffers as a result. So, we associate mass production with poor quality. I've been spending a lot of time studying historical armour manufacturing and also rocketry. It's clear to me that the goods manufactured by passionate, talented, (and largely under-capitalized) craftspeople are inferior to what could be made by automation. It's just that they're often superior to what is actually made by cost-cutting automation. Note: I'm all for people "geeking out" about their interests. As we automate more work, people will need more hobbies.
- freemarketteddy 15y ago
  > It's clear to me that the goods manufactured by passionate, talented, (and largely under-capitalized) craftspeople are inferior to what could be made by automation. That is not true for all goods....I cannot forsee a computer making a better painting than a good human artist in the near future....In fact I cant even forsee a computer understanding what a good painting actually is in the near future...This holds true for music too....In general works of art are (and will be in the near future) better crafted by humans. But can you please point to me some good books on this subject.I find this topic very interesting.
  - JabavuAdams 15y ago
    I can foresee software being able to discern good paintings from bad based purely on supervised learning from examples, with today's technology. I.e. humans label paintings as good or not good and the machine learns to extrapolate from this. Is there a consensus among humans about what makes a painting good, though? Perhaps we could settle on well-made. I.e. I may not like an artifact but I can agree that it's well made. Creating good paintings seems like it should be doable, but take a couple/few decades. Music should be a lot easier, as music is a much simpler signal than images. I'll probably start with music. Making maille: http://www.mailleartisans.org/articles/articledisplay.cgi?key=202 http://www.mailleartisans.org/articles/articledisplay.cgi?ke... Rolling plate armour edges: http://www.ageofarmour.com/education/armour_rolled_edges1.html http://www.ageofarmour.com/education/armour_rolled_edges1.ht... Armour reading list: http://www.ageofarmour.com/instock/books.html http://www.ageofarmour.com/instock/books.html Machine Learning: http://www.ml-class.org/ http://www.ml-class.org/ AI Composer: http://singularityhub.com/2009/10/09/music-created-by-learning-computer-getting-better/ http://singularityhub.com/2009/10/09/music-created-by-learni...
    - kd0amg 15y ago
      I can foresee software being able to discern good paintings from bad based purely on supervised learning from examples, with today's technology. Unless we manage strong AI, I expect this effort to get stuck in arguments over feature selection.
      - JabavuAdams 15y ago
        Is this so different from the human experience? :P That's not art! Yes it is! ...
        kd0amg 15y ago
        Noisy data labeling presents an additional problem, yes, but I was under the impression that there existed techniques for mitigating that problem.
  - 15y ago
- einhverfr 15y ago
  This raises the very interesting question, in my mind: What is to be the proper center of the economy, the individual human or social equivalent (say, household unit)? Or the machine or social equivalent (corporation, institution, government)? Personally, I'd rather live in a place where humans and social equivalents were the center rather than where we were at best pieces of a social machine. So maybe there is something to the social superiority of supporting small businesses as much as we humanly can.
timwiseman 15y ago
This makes sense. The vast majority of things I buy, I buy to use, I couldn't care less how they were made (within reason, I would switch brands if I found out making that particular type of toothbrush involved the slow torture of puppies). But I understand the appeal of seeing certain items as works of art in their own right, even if the item also has a functional value. Once it is a piece of art first and its function is secondary, I care very much how it was made and by whom.

JabavuAdams 15y ago

Marketing works. This is an example of marketing based on authenticity. Regarding perfection: machines are much more capable of perfection re: manufacturing than humans. Where I think we get confused is that in the past only corporations had the capital to mass-produce, and they have an incentive to "race to the bottom" in terms of production cost. Although it's not the goal, usually quality suffers as a result. So, we associate mass production with poor quality. I've been spending a lot of time studying historical armour manufacturing and also rocketry. It's clear to me that the goods manufactured by passionate, talented, (and largely under-capitalized) craftspeople are inferior to what could be made by automation. It's just that they're often superior to what is actually made by cost-cutting automation. Note: I'm all for people "geeking out" about their interests. As we automate more work, people will need more hobbies.

freemarketteddy 15y ago
> It's clear to me that the goods manufactured by passionate, talented, (and largely under-capitalized) craftspeople are inferior to what could be made by automation. That is not true for all goods....I cannot forsee a computer making a better painting than a good human artist in the near future....In fact I cant even forsee a computer understanding what a good painting actually is in the near future...This holds true for music too....In general works of art are (and will be in the near future) better crafted by humans. But can you please point to me some good books on this subject.I find this topic very interesting.
- JabavuAdams 15y ago
  I can foresee software being able to discern good paintings from bad based purely on supervised learning from examples, with today's technology. I.e. humans label paintings as good or not good and the machine learns to extrapolate from this. Is there a consensus among humans about what makes a painting good, though? Perhaps we could settle on well-made. I.e. I may not like an artifact but I can agree that it's well made. Creating good paintings seems like it should be doable, but take a couple/few decades. Music should be a lot easier, as music is a much simpler signal than images. I'll probably start with music. Making maille: http://www.mailleartisans.org/articles/articledisplay.cgi?key=202 http://www.mailleartisans.org/articles/articledisplay.cgi?ke... Rolling plate armour edges: http://www.ageofarmour.com/education/armour_rolled_edges1.html http://www.ageofarmour.com/education/armour_rolled_edges1.ht... Armour reading list: http://www.ageofarmour.com/instock/books.html http://www.ageofarmour.com/instock/books.html Machine Learning: http://www.ml-class.org/ http://www.ml-class.org/ AI Composer: http://singularityhub.com/2009/10/09/music-created-by-learning-computer-getting-better/ http://singularityhub.com/2009/10/09/music-created-by-learni...
  - kd0amg 15y ago
    I can foresee software being able to discern good paintings from bad based purely on supervised learning from examples, with today's technology. Unless we manage strong AI, I expect this effort to get stuck in arguments over feature selection.
    - JabavuAdams 15y ago
      Is this so different from the human experience? :P That's not art! Yes it is! ...
      - kd0amg 15y ago
        Noisy data labeling presents an additional problem, yes, but I was under the impression that there existed techniques for mitigating that problem.
- 15y ago
einhverfr 15y ago
This raises the very interesting question, in my mind: What is to be the proper center of the economy, the individual human or social equivalent (say, household unit)? Or the machine or social equivalent (corporation, institution, government)? Personally, I'd rather live in a place where humans and social equivalents were the center rather than where we were at best pieces of a social machine. So maybe there is something to the social superiority of supporting small businesses as much as we humanly can.

timwiseman 15y ago

This makes sense. The vast majority of things I buy, I buy to use, I couldn't care less how they were made (within reason, I would switch brands if I found out making that particular type of toothbrush involved the slow torture of puppies). But I understand the appeal of seeing certain items as works of art in their own right, even if the item also has a functional value. Once it is a piece of art first and its function is secondary, I care very much how it was made and by whom.