3 ms·
Not a bad checklist (“model info sheet”) But rather than stand-alone, it should be incorporated into publications. In my experience, only a minority of applie
by antipaul 4y ago
Not a bad checklist (“model info sheet”)
But rather than stand-alone, it should be incorporated into publications.
In my experience, only a minority of applied machine learning papers provide even a minority of the info requested by the info sheet.
Meaning, you really have no proper idea how cross validation was done, what preprocessing was done etc. - in actually published papers
- randomwalker 4y agoOP here. I totally agree that ideally authors should report most of this information in the paper itself. One advantage of a standalone document (we suggest putting it in an appendix) is that it's easy for reviewers to check that all of this information has been reported. Of course, authors could answer some of the questions by pointing to the sections of the paper in which they have been answered.