It is interesting seeing the evolution of open source maintenance in the light of new (or increasing) supply chain attacks and acts of political protest. There

It is interesting seeing the evolution of open source maintenance in the light of new (or increasing) supply chain attacks and acts of political protest. There always has been a "what is your obligation to quickly respond to a security issue?" expectation around the code and now similar obligatory expectation questions arise on the maintenance process itself. We also see what seems like rather balkanized approaches (npm, pypi, cargo, ...). It would be great if broader consensus arose on what the ideal standard should be for package management and distribution that then those projects could adhere to. Similar about commit access to repos and what the requirements there should be. It's also peculiar how much stronger the guarantees you get from your operating system vendor are w.r.t. signatures on packages vs what the underlying projects themselves have. OSs have had this pretty well handled for decades, but no common best practices like 2fa, signatures, etc seem to have emerged.