4 ms·
My understanding is that it was classism. That is, only the "right" people could dedicate themselves to becoming a world-class athlete without any financial su
by GoatOfAplomb 4y ago
My understanding is that it was classism. That is, only the "right" people could dedicate themselves to becoming a world-class athlete without any financial support, and they didn't want to complete with the "wrong" people. I think you can see similar in how "prize fight" boxing was initially looked down upon as a corruption of gentlemanly dueling.
(Can't find sources for this right now, sorry. And I'm not even positive I am remembering it correctly. So perhaps take my response with a grain of salt.)
- worker_person 4y agoI've read articles to this affect as well. I have social clubs near me that start at 45,000 a year to join. (You're required to spend a lot of money). Men only up until somewhat recently. Basically golf/tennis and dining for rich folks or people they are trying to impress. Got invited a lot when I would work directly with fortune 100 CEO's. Was both fun and educational. Interesting to meet board members of companies I loved / hated.