3 ms·
google terminated her contract with modis not with her directly. i don't see how the law protects her modis contract. Its upto her employer modis to provide w
by dominotw 4y ago
google terminated her contract with modis not with her directly. i don't see how the law protects her modis contract.
Its upto her employer modis to provide working conditions that she desires not google's responsibility.
- pilgrimfff 4y agoIf inserting an intermediary voided all employment law, everyone would be hired through an intermediary. It would be a huge perverse incentive.
- dominotw 4y agoHow does intermediary not get similarly held accountable in court and continue operating. I am not sure what law is being voided.
- anotherman554 4y agoThe point is if Google causes her employer to violate labor law I believe google would also be legally responsible for violating labor law. If Google directs her company's actions then Google becomes liable for the results. If anything illegal happened it's only if Google had nothing to do with the decision making that would cause it to not be Google's problem.