This article seems to use quotes and then provide no context for them which makes for confusing reading: >Assistant US Attorney Michael D. Lockard asserted tha

This article seems to use quotes and then provide no context for them which makes for confusing reading: >Assistant US Attorney Michael D. Lockard asserted that on April 20, 2016, Schulte “stole the entirety of the CIA’s highly sensitive cyber intelligence capabilities.” This occurred just days after the CIA “locked the defendant out of the secure restricted vault-like location on the network.” So is the prosecution asserting that he hacked into the network after having his access revoked? In the next article the article states: >“Shortly after stealing this extraordinarily sensitive intelligence information, the defendant transmitted those backups to WikiLeaks, knowing full well that WikiLeaks would put it up on the internet,” Lockard argued. Is the assertion here that the dump obtained via a local backup this the defendant made? This is really kind of a poorly written article.