3 ms·
I do peer review, and know colleagues that do as well. I'd say the median number of articles reviewed per person in a given year is 10. I don't claim to represe
by HelloMcFly 4y ago
I do peer review, and know colleagues that do as well. I'd say the median number of articles reviewed per person in a given year is 10. I don't claim to represent most reviewers, but I also don't think a presumption that reviewers primarily only have time to half-ass it is fair either.
- thaumasiotes 4y ago> I'd say the median number of articles reviewed per person in a given year is 10. That's a pretty light annual workload. How do you get to be one of those people? Or do those people have other work to do?
- NoSorryCannot 4y agoThey are other researchers in the field. Literally, your peers. Yes, they have other work to do.
- thaumasiotes 4y agoYes, I'm aware of those things. I'm pointing out that the number of papers someone reviews in a year is not even distantly related to the amount of attention they have available to devote to the job.