3 ms·
Too bad this came out before Drew intended, and I hope that after having a weekend to rest he’ll feel his motivation recover. One meta-thought, I think project
by burlesona 4y ago
Too bad this came out before Drew intended, and I hope that after having a weekend to rest he’ll feel his motivation recover.
One meta-thought, I think projects like this are surfacing something interesting: The underlying technology to make a pretty good search engine is no longer especially difficult for programmers or for server. This is potentially a very good thing, as it means the end of the Google era.
I can imagine a future that is almost a blast from the past, where there are a lot of different search engines, those engines are curated differently, and while none of them index the entire Internet, that’s what makes them valuable and better than Google (which I think cannot defeat spam).
I’m trying to think of a historical parallel, Where are some service used to be very difficult to provide and therefore could only effectively be done by a single natural monopoly, but technology progressed and opened up the playing field, breaking the monopoly. Television has some similarities. Perhaps radio vs podcasting. What others?
- voidfunc 4y agoWhat Google has is marketing and momentum... its the ubiquitous search engine.
- marginalia_nu 4y agoGoogle also funnels a lot of traffic to itself through Chrome's search bar, and Firefox does the same. Sure you can replace the search engine, but whatever you replace it with needs to have the same capabilities or the entire model falls apart. Meanwhile, alternative means of navigating the web (such as bookmarks) are made increasingly difficult to access, requiring multiple clicks. I don't mean to be conspiratorial, I'm sure there are good intentions behind this, the consequence however is effectively locking in Google as the default gateway for the Internet.