Sure, maybe. I guess you can argue two things: 1. That outcomes should be binary, i.e. "guilty" or "innocent" with no mistrials. 2. That outcomes should be de

Sure, maybe. I guess you can argue two things: 1. That outcomes should be binary, i.e. "guilty" or "innocent" with no mistrials. 2. That outcomes should be decided by unanimous, supermajority, majority, or some other arrangements. I don't think either of those arguments are especially fundamental. My point was only that it's a bit hyperbolic to view the whole hung jury rule as some sort of Bill of Rights violation.