It can certainly be a helpful feature, but I wonder whether it's really better than good, relevant search results presented in a readable way. For example I'd a

It can certainly be a helpful feature, but I wonder whether it's really better than good, relevant search results presented in a readable way. For example I'd argue the manually curated infoboxes on Wikipedia are likely more reliable than the algorithmic versions Google shows in their results, especially as it's difficult to fix mistakes in Google's version. Google thinks their own solution is the best one because Google made it and so they circumvent the whole page ranking process. Some queries of course need more than just plain search results (see Semantic Web and related things) but for those most engines don't offer enough control and transparency. But I'm glad people are trying to build alternatives. I'd love a search engine that ignores sites with antipatterns like required registration for any kind of usage, and this is the first step.