3 ms·

I think that's exactly why OP's idea will take off. Everyone is too scared to build a competitor. Airbnb started by spamming Craigslist with fake ads. Stripe s

I think that's exactly why OP's idea will take off. Everyone is too scared to build a competitor. Airbnb started by spamming Craigslist with fake ads. Stripe started by accepting payments to a single bank account. Doing something shoddy/somewhat shady and not being afraid of the repercussions gets you ahead in startups. So what if OP breaks someone's "TOS", by the time they notice or OP's product gets big enough too care, he will likely have sufficient enough capital to fight them off. If he never gets that big, more power to him for something that makes him some beer money.

onion2k 4y ago
Stripe started by accepting payments to a single bank account. Where can I read more about that? It sounds fascinating..
- smcn 4y ago
  https://read.first1000.co/p/-stripe https://read.first1000.co/p/-stripe This might be of some interest
  - languageserver 4y ago
    heck, that is probably the worst formatting I have ever read for an article
    - smcn 4y ago
      Too many emojis for my taste but they're interesting enough that I get over that hurdle. It does feel like someone trying to advertise to me on Twitter though.
quickthrower2 4y ago
You will probably find there are a lot of people up for it. There is a whole black hat community out there trying to make a fast buck fast and loose. If anything this would be too pedestrian!
hnbad 4y ago
The problem with this approach is that it's high reward but also high risk. On the one end you have Airbnb spamming Craigslist (which at worst could have resulted in a cease & desist preventing future use of that marketing channel) and on the other end you have Theranos setting up a fake lab and producing fraudulent blood tests. "Be bold" and "fake it till you make it" are good slogans, but there is always a gradient between boldness and reckless negligence. "Take calculated risks" just doesn't have the same ring to it. If OP gets banned by Discord and Slack, their product is dead in the water and they'll have to deal with angry customers who paid for a service OP can no longer provide. This means if this really is a TOS violation, they'll either have to fly under the radar (which arguably failed when they hit HN front page) or they need to grow influential enough to enter negotiation with Slack and Discord to get a special deal.
MangoCoffee 4y ago
I think your analogy is flawed. Linen have dependencies (Slack/Discord). while Airbnb and Stripe are independent. There won't be enough money to fight them (Slack/Discord) if it stated in their TOS that they can turn off their services. Linen's situation is more like developing add-ons for Microsoft's Office until Microsoft decided to add features that does what your add-ons do for free.

onion2k 4y ago

Stripe started by accepting payments to a single bank account. Where can I read more about that? It sounds fascinating..

smcn 4y ago
https://read.first1000.co/p/-stripe https://read.first1000.co/p/-stripe This might be of some interest
- languageserver 4y ago
  heck, that is probably the worst formatting I have ever read for an article
  - smcn 4y ago
    Too many emojis for my taste but they're interesting enough that I get over that hurdle. It does feel like someone trying to advertise to me on Twitter though.

quickthrower2 4y ago

You will probably find there are a lot of people up for it. There is a whole black hat community out there trying to make a fast buck fast and loose. If anything this would be too pedestrian!

hnbad 4y ago

The problem with this approach is that it's high reward but also high risk. On the one end you have Airbnb spamming Craigslist (which at worst could have resulted in a cease & desist preventing future use of that marketing channel) and on the other end you have Theranos setting up a fake lab and producing fraudulent blood tests. "Be bold" and "fake it till you make it" are good slogans, but there is always a gradient between boldness and reckless negligence. "Take calculated risks" just doesn't have the same ring to it. If OP gets banned by Discord and Slack, their product is dead in the water and they'll have to deal with angry customers who paid for a service OP can no longer provide. This means if this really is a TOS violation, they'll either have to fly under the radar (which arguably failed when they hit HN front page) or they need to grow influential enough to enter negotiation with Slack and Discord to get a special deal.

MangoCoffee 4y ago

I think your analogy is flawed. Linen have dependencies (Slack/Discord). while Airbnb and Stripe are independent. There won't be enough money to fight them (Slack/Discord) if it stated in their TOS that they can turn off their services. Linen's situation is more like developing add-ons for Microsoft's Office until Microsoft decided to add features that does what your add-ons do for free.