3 ms·
> The issue of disposal is also simply incorrect. There are plenty of places to store it. The question is not, whether there are places or not. It doesn't matt
by sexy_panda 4y ago
> The issue of disposal is also simply incorrect. There are plenty of places to store it.
The question is not, whether there are places or not. It doesn't matter if none of the 16 regions in Germany wants to be responsible to store the waste.
If no one wants to deal with it, the effect is the same.
- tarsinge 4y agoThe discussion was on technical feasibility, that Germany is irrational (because it’s not a question of wanting to store, it’s a choice between that and fossil waste = storage in the atmosphere = climate change) is another.
- dispat0r 4y agoGermany already has nuclear waste, we have to deal with it one way or another. I think permanent storage is a bad solution, most of the energy is still in there and further utilization will also reduce the danger of the waste.
- epups 4y agoSo it's impossible to resolve this issue? We cannot use our partners in the EU or abroad to help solve it? Well I guess we should just kill thousands with coal, and keep feeding the global warming furnace.