3 ms·
> so, so arrogant. Yeah, your reaction is. The whole point was to be humble and accept that you might be wrong. In particular, if well-done research contradict
by diffeomorphism 4y ago
> so, so arrogant.
Yeah, your reaction is. The whole point was to be humble and accept that you might be wrong. In particular, if well-done research contradicts your prior belief, then you "have no choice" but to consider that you might have been wrong.
It turns out that the "well-done" was not the case here, but I find it hard to think your post was in good faith.
- tome 4y agoBut Kahneman didn't say "no choice but to consider" he said "no choice but to _accept_" which is a much stronger statement.