So. The entire argument of the article seems to be "it's insecure because it's vetted by someone else than us". But nowhere does it say what the actual vetting

So. The entire argument of the article seems to be "it's insecure because it's vetted by someone else than us". But nowhere does it say what the actual vetting process for QWACs is and how it differs from the one of current certificates. Is that explained somewhere? Also a bit disingenuous that nowhere on the page, they link to the actual specifications or discussions of the regulation, not even Wikipedia. All we get are some barebone definitions with a heavy dose of spin. But of course they already have a cute ducky logo. Right now, this just reads like a power struggle between browsers and EU, with browsers (or at least Mozilla) trying to style this as some kind of grassroots movement. I'm tired of billion dollar companies pretending to be student protesters. Wikipedia page on QWACs btw: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qualified_website_authentication_certificate https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qualified_website_authentica...