7 ms·

This is why many Stripes on blind are not angry. They will get more shares next year.

• radicaldreamer 4y ago
  They should still be angry because this company should’ve gone public and made them liquid a year ago.
  • OgAstorga 4y ago
    Shouldn't going public on an unrealistic market cap would cause more issues than benefits? Sure, a healthy exit is ok but later pressure to recover the market cap in the short term can cause heavy structural damages inside any org.
    • throw125412423 4y ago
      I'd rather have cash in my bank account and work for a company that will suffer structural damage than see my hypothetical net worth go down 60%.
      • arcticbull 4y ago
        You're gonna love a job at Netflix :)
    • repsilat 4y ago
      I think that's a more complicated explanation than necessary. If their private valuation is higher than their public valuation it means they can raise money more cheaply while private.
      • echelon 4y ago
        To the benefit of the company and the people that control Stripe, not necessarily the hard working ICs that would enjoy liquidity. The opportunity cost of this restriction on their lives is huge. Had they gone public two years ago, employees would have benefitted from a market of a lifetime, with equity in one of the best tickets in town. A lot of life changing early retirements and "Fat FIRE".
        • id 4y ago
          >The opportunity cost of this restriction on their lives is huge. What restriction, exactly?
          • ethbr0 4y ago
            That they continue working at Stripe, instead of pursuing other life goals. Or to phrase parent's point differently: by not IPO'ing, Stripe forfeited the premium public markets would have been willing to pay Stripe employees for their stock.
            • id 4y ago
              Isn't that their choice, though?
              • ethbr0 4y ago
                Not after Stripe decided not to IPO.
          • peanuty1 4y ago
            The restriction of not being able to liquidate their shares on the public market because of Stripe staying private for an unusually long time (Block (formerly Square), the other double-digit billion-dollar Silicon Valley payments company founded in 2009, went public in 2015). I imagine most Stripe employees that joined in 2019 and earlier expected Stripe to have gone public by now.
    • deleted 4y ago
      [deleted]
  • rob74 4y ago
    I doubt that last year was a good time to go public. At the stock market, the shares would likely have fallen by more than 28%. Plus, you can't sell RSUs right away, and watching them sit there and lose value is a pretty frustrating experience too...
    • peanuty1 4y ago
      The market caps of other Silicon Valley payments companies like Block (formerly Square) and PayPal peaked in Q1-Q3 2021 before declining in Q4. So if Stripe went public before Q2 2021 (to account for 6 month lockup period), their stock-holding employees should have been able to enjoy the opportunity to profit very nicely on their RSUs.
  • 40acres 4y ago
    I'm not too sure about this. Stripe has double trigger RSUs with a 6 or 7mo lock up. Let's say they went public in '21 instead of raising money in June of that year. The market would've already turned by the end of the lockup period. By delaying the IPO there is still some chance that the shares can be sold on the public market for more than the grant price -- I would note that this really benefits Stripe hired post-2020 but at this point that's like 75% of the company.