7 ms·
DynamoDB was already large scale at that time. The point is: the number of services don't need to scale with the level of demand.
by rmbyrro 4y ago
DynamoDB was already large scale at that time.
The point is: the number of services don't need to scale with the level of demand.
- deanCommie 4y agoMy comment was about " paper fails to acknowledge a FOSS database (once?) underneath it: MySQL/InnoDB (and references it as B-Tree instead)." should have been more clear