3 ms·
I'd say that it wasn't the epistemology that was flawed, but the studies. (Though, ok, arguably it was a flaw in the epistemology that it didn't allow for flaws
by FabHK 4y ago
I'd say that it wasn't the epistemology that was flawed, but the studies. (Though, ok, arguably it was a flaw in the epistemology that it didn't allow for flaws in the studies.) But the more interesting question is how the initial studies could have been so flawed. At any rate, those results were not replicated, and science marches on.
- Jensson 4y agoHow is "More important, you must accept that they are true about you." anything but flawed? If something is true for 60% of people must you accept that it is true for you as well, even though evidently it wasn't true for 40%?