3 ms·

There's reasons why it takes time. The perspective that it's "just produce rebranded RPMs" really undersells even something as significant as the amount of ser

There's reasons why it takes time. The perspective that it's "just produce rebranded RPMs" really undersells even something as significant as the amount of server power required to recompile all the packages. You couldn't get the packages until the distribution upstream had released, so no way to get ahead of the build time. You just had to suck it up at release time. You used to be able to track the build process for CentOS when it was a RHEL clone, see how many packages were left to go as the days crawled past. Things are a little better with the way that development happens more recently. 6 was a massive delay for distributions because RedHat had overhauled a lot around the build process and distributions needed to completely overhaul their stuff too, in ways that weren't that obvious.

freedomben 4y ago
> The perspective that it's "just produce rebranded RPMs" really undersells even something as significant as the amount of server power required to recompile all the packages. Just wanted to clarify, I agree with you completely. I didn't anywhere perpetuate the unfair "it's just produce rebranded RPMs" (which is actually accurate, but trivializes the significant process involved in rebranding and rebuilding, hence IMO misleading). It's a significant amount of work. The time it takes is not unreasonable given the effort involved. That said, the amount of time was painful. I've never complained about it because I'm grateful for anything and everything they do, and I'm not complaining about it now. I'm recognizing the facts around speed of delivery, but in no way suggesting they aren't for a good reason.