2 ms·

and RH doesn't have to bear much of the cost of the development of Linux, GNU, and many other products. This is the spirit of OS.. If you think that's unethical

and RH doesn't have to bear much of the cost of the development of Linux, GNU, and many other products. This is the spirit of OS.. If you think that's unethical, you should find another employer ;) edit: ah.. former employee.. so that part was already done :)

freedomben 4y ago
> RH doesn't have to bear much of the cost of the development of Linux, GNU, and many other products. I disagree. RH is one of the top contributors to many of the major projects that make up the distro. Also the process of building/maintaining a distro is itself enormous. The 3rd parties have none of that expense so they can undercut the cost easily. In the end it hurts the whole ecosystem, while benefiting a select few.
- kasabali 4y ago
  > In the end it hurts the whole ecosystem If this hurts the whole ecosystem, all community developed distributions must have been hurting it, too, by your bizarre interpretation of free software and/or arrogant take on ethics. Explain how anything you've said so far in this sub thread can't be summed up to "red hat good, everyone else leeches".