3 ms·
Yeah very very few people are going to follow that, the vast majority will find the idea disgusting and not nearly beneficial enough to justify it.
by KoftaBob 4y ago
Yeah very very few people are going to follow that, the vast majority will find the idea disgusting and not nearly beneficial enough to justify it.
- lotsofpulp 4y agoHence the educational ad campaign to inform and inspire change. It is just for the home anyway, not public restrooms. And at the end of the day, even if the vast majority find it disgusting, increasing water/sewage prices will force the change sooner or later.
- collegeburner 4y agothat is so patronizing. you can't "educate" when people find something disgusting and saying that's "educating" is arrogant. like if that's objectively people's preferences you can't say your preference is right and therefore you're "educating" them. and there's good reason, it still smells. so no imma keep flushing it.
- lotsofpulp 4y agoObviously if it smells, you should flush. But in my experience, my urine in the toilet bowl never smells outside of when I eat asparagus. Perhaps it is a sign to drink more water? The education is also about water not being an unlimited resource. I have no idea how educating or reminding people of that is patronizing or arrogant, but to each their own.
- KoftaBob 4y agoSidenote, if I understand correctly, the environmental/resource impact of water usage (outside of droughts) is that treating/filtering water uses electricity, not so much that the water itself is being wasted. Am I on the right track here?