3 ms·
It gets better: this glyph is bugged. Somehow, the guy responsible for adding it to Unicode somehow got the number of eyes wrong. Per his description, Unicode f
by lmkg 4y ago
It gets better: this glyph is bugged. Somehow, the guy responsible for adding it to Unicode somehow got the number of eyes wrong. Per his description, Unicode fonts represent it with 7 eyes, but after getting called out on Twitter he realized the original manuscript shows 10 eyes.
This bug will be fixed in Unicode 15.
- B1FF_PSUVM 4y agoAchieving peak Byzantium there, I guess.
- corrral 4y agoWhat about modern uses of the character that specifically intended 7 eyes? Unicode needs to add a time or (worse, but probably OK) version datum to glyphs or glyph ranges, I suppose (applying it only at the document level wouldn't suffice, as in the case of quoting).
- kzrdude 4y agoGoing to the release note pdf, it will "expand" to 10 eyes by adding one more to the end of each horizontal row (if people are curious).