3 ms·
I'd love to see Gabriel weigh in on this. I wonder if Duck Duck Go will be able to take advantage of this resource?
by mthoms 15y ago
I'd love to see Gabriel weigh in on this. I wonder if Duck Duck Go will be able to take advantage of this resource?
- coderdude 15y agoNova Spivack said that the crawls have been going for several years. There's a good chance that many of the pages in the archive are unacceptably outdated for indexing purposes.
- jerfelix 15y agoI'm not sure whether major portions of their archive are unacceptably outdated. But I am sure that it would be logic failure to conclude that it must be out of date simply because they've been indexing for several years. With that logic, Google would be further out of date, having indexed for over a decade.
- ahadrana 15y agoHi. I work for commoncrawl. We are about to start an improved recrawl and will be doing this more frequently going forward. In the process we will also consolidate our data on S3 to keep it relevant. But, as with any crawl of the Internet, there is lot of noise in there. We spent most of 2011 tweaking the algorithms to improve the freshness and quality of the crawl, and hopefully this work starts to show results in 2012.
- wcchandler 15y agoThis was my first thought, too. I can't seem to hit the resource to check it out but even if the content is "stale" it can be used for a couple different reasons. Initial snapshot of pages, decent starting index on self crawling (instead of reliance on BOSS or Bing), content differentiation, nullifying search bias (if existent)... But I'm not really a search guy so I could be jaded on its importance.
- epi0Bauqu 15y agoI love stuff like this effort. The more open data sources, the better for everyone. I'm sure we (DuckDuckGo) will find a way to make use of it :)