3 ms·
Nitpicking, but he lies right off-the-bat: "Yeah. And the presumption is that I wouldn’t be able to stay on budget, which is the opposite of the truth. Every o
by frognumber 4y ago
Nitpicking, but he lies right off-the-bat:
"Yeah. And the presumption is that I wouldn’t be able to stay on budget, which is the opposite of the truth. Every one of our buildings hits the budget."
MIT Stata Center was budgeted at $100M. It was well over 4x that cost before it was even finished (http://archive.boston.com/news/globe/living/articles/2003/09/11/questions_build_right_along_with_mits_stata_center/ http://archive.boston.com/news/globe/living/articles/2003/09...). The costs went up from there, as when it rained outside, it also rained inside, and there were all sorts of other unforeseen problems. There were litigation, which Gehry shrugged off.
The inside of the building was a train wreck. You had walls at odd angle, where you couldn't fit a standard bookcase or file cabinet. The acoustics meant that you could hear conversations as far as a different floor. All the issues to make it a practical place to work still haven't been addressed.
But as much as it sucks as a place to work, it's a great monument to faculty and administrator egos.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- tzs 4y ago> The inside of the building was a train wreck. You had walls at odd angle, where you couldn't fit a standard bookcase or file cabinet. I once worked on the second floor of a two floor geodesic dome and the outside walls had that problem. Nothing insurmountable but it was a bit annoying. Here's a little more on that [1]. [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29301072 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29301072