5 ms·
And the person I'm replying to, in the order of their statements and questions, first assumes that it is a bold claim and after that decides they don't understa
by feet 4y ago
And the person I'm replying to, in the order of their statements and questions, first assumes that it is a bold claim and after that decides they don't understand the statement they're replying to. It's backwards
- mym1990 4y agoMust be fun spending the whole day looking for technicalities to address.
- feet 4y agoNo, I just understand how to make valid criticisms. First step before you can criticize is to understand what you're criticizing
- abduhl 4y agoIt's not backwards. Calling housing and land an X and saying that this means it should have heavy state intervention IS a bold claim regardless of what X is because it's calling for heavy state intervention. Compare: "Abortion is a non-transable good and therefore there should be heavy state intervention in it." "Video games are non-transable goods and so there should be heavy state intervention in it." "Cryptography is a non-transable good and therefore should heavily be regulated by the government." All of these are BOLD claims regardless of what non-transable means, and it's appropriate to ask what non-transable means in order to understand why the bold claim stands.
- aaaaaaaaaaab 4y agoSorry, but this is a non-transable comment, and I only reply to transable comments.
- spaniard89277 4y agoI like your style, you made me laugh.
- feet 4y agoI think you missed the point I was making