5 ms·
These cost estimates do not include the maintenance of the waste products of nuclear energy production. These costs are astonishingly! If the 10,000 year cost
by dagaci 4y ago
These cost estimates do not include the maintenance of the waste products of nuclear energy production.
These costs are astonishingly!
If the 10,000 year costs fell on the producers and consumers directly (this is how it should be), they would quickly have a different point of different view
- Nimitz14 4y agoI believe the costs for nuclear are longterm.
- p1mrx 4y agoDrill hole, insert waste: https://vimeo.com/458322589 https://vimeo.com/458322589 It's really not that hard, except from a political standpoint.
- dagaci 4y agoThats fine, solutions are always fine. But ensure that only the consumers of this power and pay for its construction an upkeep
- p1mrx 4y agoAlso ensure that consumers pay for emitting atmospheric CO₂, including backup power when wind and solar are offline due to weather.
- freemint 4y agoAnd when those numbers are run they turn out cheaper then nuclear
- p1mrx 4y agoDo you mean that for the purpose of backing up wind and solar, it will be cheaper to use fossil fuels and sequester the carbon, than to use nuclear energy and sequester the waste?
- freemint 4y agoNo it will be cheaper to backup renewables by renewables with infrastructure then building nuclear for world wide carbon neutral electrification.