2 ms·
The flip side here is agreement on both sides, for me that is the moral question. Not that it was filmed, but that all parties should agreed to the filming. P
by phpisthebest 4y ago
The flip side here is agreement on both sides, for me that is the moral question. Not that it was filmed, but that all parties should agreed to the filming.
Prearranging to film giving you a million dollars, is very different from just showing up an putting camera's in your face with out your foreknowledge or consent
- silicon2401 4y agoThen I think we may differ on whether we consider consent/agreement a part of kindness. I don't think it's that simple. I think an act can be kind but be delivered in an incompatible way. Asking someone how they're feeling after a breakup can be genuinely kind IMO, even if you didn't realize that that's the last thing they want to think about and asking them caused them to have an emotional breakdown that they blame you for. At this point I'm disregarding the tiktok thing entirely; I would still consider the million dollar gift to anyone an incredibly kind gesture, even if filmed without prior planning/agreement.
- IG_Semmelweiss 4y agoi think we are discussing separate points OP commingled morals and kindness when his intent (now obvious to me after rereading) was to explicitly discuss morality of the situation. You are exploring the morality of performing an action that violates moral norms (in this case, expectation of privacy) We were exploring whether it is possible to be kind from an act if the end goal is obtain valuable exchange, off the act